User talk:SuperMax124

From Audiovisual Identity Database

Latest comment: 3 months ago by Blue2000 in topic Shakla problem

Page formatting

Hi SuperMax124. Please use Template:PageCredits for the credits. You can read CLG:CREDITS for more information on using the template. Also, Background and years should be in Heading 3, and add the appropriate categories to the pages. Thanks. Logohub (talk) 08:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Question

Where did you find the opening logos for Malignant, and is there a video on YouTube? LF13-wiki1.png LF13-wiki2.png / 12:19, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Regarding your recent edits to a sock:

Hello, I thought I'd just come by to tell you that I have been monitoring these socks of Chuck Quenano, and I will be reporting them to a Steward as a local community member in due course, giving them the diffs they need to launch an investigation. Rest assured that a Steward will look into them when they get the chance to see it. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) 10:30, 17 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

PS: The place where I've been monitoring them from was from Miraheze's server on Discord. DarkMatterMan4500 (talk) 10:32, 17 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Just saw their contributions, thought I saw that "CINEMARK IS FRICKIN TRIGGERED" vandalism before. Turns out, the users Csr3011 and Μπέλα2006 (the latter we thought was a user in good faith) vandalized the wiki with the same phrase before. Perhaps this Chuck Quenano is connected to them? Logohub (talk) 10:41, 17 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I remember thinking Μπέλα2006‘s account was compromised when that incident happened since it had been months after that initial vandal got blocked with no sockpuppetry occurring and it was really out of character for that user. Sig.png Talk · Edits 12:21, 17 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for clarifying. SuperMax124 (talk) 10:32, 17 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I need to come clean

I need to clarify that I won't add redundant/uncessary videos, I will focus on uploading logos and rare finds, I think you need to cancel your report against me. MJ2003 (talk) 04:47, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(cont.)
I mean I need to be friendly to a lot of users. MJ2003 (talk) 05:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Alright. Mind if I revert your edits then? SuperMax124 (talk) 12:02, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OK. MJ2003 (talk) 12:12, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm sorry about the space after - on Double Fine

It's so common that I thought it was part of site formatting. I'm sorry that I've edited maybe hundreds of pages that way. AlmightyKingPrawn (talk) 15:20, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Videos

Why do you think videos are unnecessary? Camenati (talk) 00:08, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

They aren’t that unnecessary. Though if it’s a still logo then it doesn’t need a video. SuperMax124 (talk) 00:13, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
And what makes them that way? I understand with the still logos but the animated ones? Camenati (talk) 00:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
well, if there is too much videos of the animated one I have to cut them down. SuperMax124 (talk) 00:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I agree that there shouldn't be too many videos but I don't think ALL of the videos should be removed. Perhaps one or a few videos for each logo is alright. Camenati (talk) 00:34, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Also remember we do have the collapsible option for embeds now if you think the amount of videos is going to impact loading performance. Sig.png Talk · Edits 02:04, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Gotcha you two. SuperMax124 (talk) 02:49, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why did you remove the video i added on the Erica Messer Productions article?, there is point to add them! Blue2000 (talk) 21:17, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why? I think his removal of those videos is justified since there is no animation or music in the logo, so adding a video of a logo that is literally the image shown on the article and nothing else is pretty redundant. Camenati (talk) 08:26, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Necessary

Not necessary? I haven't done anything bad/wrong on the Warner Bros. Pictures page. DipperGoodspeed1994 (talk) 04:44, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I removed that part from the Editor's Note on the 14th logo because what you wrote was not needed. Just wait for a byline update or something. SuperMax124 (talk) 04:52, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Regarding your recent page addition

Hi, so while I know that the Fifth Chance logo is brand new and there's no high-quality captures online yet, please make sure that any new page you make is at least mostly finished before publishing. Remember that we do provide a sandbox for each user, so you can work on any unfinished pages there until they're ready to be published. You can also add any suggestions for logos to be described at CLG Wiki:Logos to be Described. Thanks! HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 02:50, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Alright, I just started a sandbox. Looks like I will be doing my new pages on there going forward. Thanks for your help! SuperMax124 (talk) 02:56, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No problem! :D HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 02:58, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
One of the ideas I'd like to revive going forward is the draft system that we sort of discussed before it kind of stagnated for some reason, so hopefully we'll have a dedicated space for this kind of thing before too long Sig.png Talk · Edits 03:04, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This sounds like a good idea! HibiscusCrown20 (talk) 03:05, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Shakla problem

Shakla has removed some words off on most articles and I had to revered his edits because those words are allowed on this wiki. Please don't block me for this. Blue2000 (talk) 12:38, 9 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.